In Which Editors Become Brand-Managers →

Click through to read John Koblin’s piece on the new role editors have had to take on as magazines develop into multi-platform brands. Highlights below.

Some aren’t worried.

Everyone at Condé Nast is supportive of the most important thing — editorial freedom and independence — and, at the same time, I know that financial health is essential and so is getting our work to new readers through new technologies. Still, I don’t much love the talk of ‘brand’ and ‘brand managers’ — I prefer ‘the magazine’ and ‘editors.’ Harold Ross used to talk about The New Yorker as a cause and that’s what it is for me and for all of my colleagues.

-David Remnick, Editor, The New Yorker

Some are a bit worried.

Journalism, photography, design, creative thinking, editing and packaging, they’re what drive it all; they require a great deal of care, thought and attention, and I don’t hear a lot about them these days. What I hear is ‘That’s great for the brand.’ No, that is the brand!

-Jim Nelson, Editor-in-Chief, GQ

The consensus: This isn’t a bad problem to have.

Even though it can be annoying to hear magazines talked about as brands — because magazines themselves are fantastic creatures and brands sounds a little more homogenized — they are brands. I’m just a big believer in a good editor to understand his or her reader and their needs better than anyone. I like the future of a magazine industry that puts editors in charge of directing their brands in partnership with publishers. Would any of us really want a world that those decisions are being completely made by people who are not relating to our readers?

Cindy Leive, Editor-in-Chief, Glamour

FJP: I’d like to pull a different question out of this debate, one related to a comment Nelson made when interviewed. He argued that editorial work suffers on account of the meetings that distract from it.

Meantime, magazine making? It’s become an assumption that that’s the easy part of your day; you’ve got that covered. But it has never been easy, and the day you take your focus off it is the day the magazine becomes less interesting. So yeah, I worry about ADD, about being spread too thin, absolutely. And sometimes I think we’re pushed to do too much with too little. And I’m concerned about stress levels, for quality-of-life and quality-of-job reasons but also because, crucially, you need mental space for creativity and excellence.

Mental space for creativity and excellence. I’m instantly reminded of a Digiday piece I read yesterday, on whether privacy or collaboration better fosters creativity. It referenced an earlier NY Times opinion on the same topic, in which Susan Cain wrote, 

Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption.

Now this isn’t completely related to the editor-turned-brand-manager dilemma, but it is some interesting food for thought. I think Nelson’s point about needing mental space for creativity and excellence warrants a lot of attention. That allotting time for non-editorial endeavors is crucial for the financial health of a publication is indisputable. But I do wonder what steps publications are taking to nurture the creative health of their content.

  1. thewrathofkwan reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  2. newmedia-at-sbc reblogged this from navigatingmedia
  3. livelifealittlelovely reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  4. navigatingmedia reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  5. an-editors-eye reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  6. chrismmgordon reblogged this from futurejournalismproject and added:
    Click through to read John Koblin’s piece on the new role editors have had to take on as magazines develop into...
  7. mazingmusings reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  8. aymienanana reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  9. almabahman reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  10. marnla reblogged this from futurejournalismproject and added:
  11. futurejournalismproject posted this