…This isn’t surprising. Editorial cartoons were born in the era of newspapers, and while they now regularly appear on the Web—including in Slate—they remain stuck in the static, space-constrained, caricaturist mind-set of newsprint. The Pulitzers began awarding a prize for cartoons in 1922, and other than a few notable exceptions — Garry Trudeau’s Doonesbury in 1975, Berkeley Breathed’s Bloom County in 1987, and Mark Fiore’s animated cartoons in 2010 — the overwhelming majority of its awards have gone to traditional, single-panel cartoonists. It’s time for the Pulitzers to look past this old-fashioned medium and include graphics that are better attuned to this century.
My first suggestion would be for the committee to recognize infographics and interactive visualizations. Like most political cartoons, infographics are rarely funny. Unlike most political cartoons, the best infographics tend to pack a wallop.
Farhad Manjoo, Slate. Editorial Cartoons Are Stale, Simplistic, and Just Not Funny: The Pulitzer committee should honor slide shows, infographics, and listicles instead.
I don’t think the Pulitzer’s should abandon the editorial cartoon but absolutely agree there should be a new category for graphical stories. — Michael
- maxmaaxmaaax likes this
- michelechampagne likes this
- gregvsanthony reblogged this from jades-reality-of-it-all
- intoperilousskies reblogged this from kenyatta
- total-todd-review reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
- barelyconcealednuance likes this
- ttrruutthh reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
- nicknux likes this
- aaa2zee reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
- jades-reality-of-it-all reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
- proyectoalbahaca likes this
- burstingbubbles likes this
- lemonturtles likes this
- fleurdelanuit likes this
- kenyatta reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
- kenyatta likes this
- futurejournalismproject posted this