We have been worried about the direction Wikileaks is going for a while. In the recent month the focus moved away from actual leaks and the fight for freedom of information further and further while it concentrated more and more on Julian Assange. It goes without saying that we oppose any plans of extraditing Julian to the USA. He is a content provider and publisher, not a criminal.

But Wikileaks is not - or should not be - about Julian Assange alone. The idea behind Wikileaks was to provide the public with information that would otherwise being kept secret by industries and governments. Information we strongly believe the public has a right to know. But this has been pushed more and more into the background, instead we only hear about Julian Assange, like he had dinner last night with Lady Gaga. That’s great for him but not much of our interest. We are more interested in transparent governments and bringing out documents and information they want to hide from the public…

…The conclusion for us is that we cannot support anymore what Wikileaks has become - the One Man Julian Assange show. But we also want to make clear that we still support the original idea behind Wikileaks: Freedom of information and transparent governments. Sadly we realize that Wikileaks does not stand for this idea anymore.

Anonymous, Statement on Wikileaks.

Background: On Wednesday, Wikileaks began releasing 200,000 “Global Intelligence files” containing some five million emails from and to the private US intelligence firm Stratfor.

Wikileaks alleges that because of the close connection between the company and the government, “these GI Files releases will shed insight into key U.S. federal election players.” For example, the first release of almost 14,000 files are from 2011 and contain the keywords “republican”, “GOP”, “Romney”, “RNC” and “GOP”.

Further, the files were originally obtained by Anonymous-related groups.

However, when visitors went to Wikileaks to take a look at the files they were hit with a paywall. This was a Javascript overlay requesting a donation. Without making one, a user couldn’t access the documents.

And that set Anonymous off. Or, since it’s a decentralized activist group, it set off those behind @YourAnonNews who wrote to their 640,000 followers, “This, dear friends will lose you all allies you still had. @Wikileaks, please die in a fire, kthxbai.”

  1. buddhassecret reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  2. horusporus reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  3. onebytwobythreebyme reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  4. mr-muppetface reblogged this from dinosaurusrachelus
  5. dinosaurusrachelus reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  6. quarterlifethinking reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  7. melissabrewer reblogged this from joanofamber
  8. queenkitsch reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  9. joanofamber reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  10. rachelcstella reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  11. thesocialmedianerd reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  12. jessicayuwanto reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  13. fromrusholmewithlove reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  14. ourladyoflazarus reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  15. climateadaptation said: wikileaks’ facebook page is a shrine to assange. thanks for posting this!
  16. watchoutforthebullets reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  17. nsd31 reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  18. futurejournalismproject posted this