Nilay Patel considers the end of Network Neutrality at The Verge:

Massive companies like AT&T and Comcast have spent the first two months of 2014 boldly announcing plans to close and control the internet through additional fees, pay-to-play schemes, and sheer brutal size — all while the legal rules designed to protect against these kinds of abuses were struck down in court for basically making too much sense. “Broadband providers represent a threat to internet openness,” concluded Judge David Tatel in Verizon’s case against the FCC’s Open Internet order, adding that the FCC had provided ample evidence of internet companies abusing their market power and had made “a rational connection between the facts found and the choices made.” Verizon argued strenuously, but had offered the court “no persuasive reason to question that judgement.”
Then Tatel cut the FCC off at the knees for making “a rather half-hearted argument” in support of its authority to properly police these threats and vacated the rules protecting the open internet, surprising observers on both sides of the industry and sending new FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler into a tailspin of empty promises seemingly designed to disappoint everyone.

Looking for a recommendation to bring Network Neutrality back? Make your voice heard by emailing and calling FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.
Looking for a different perspective? Try GigaOm where Mathew Ingram pulls together a Twitter conversation between Marc Andreessen and assorted journalists about how enforcing Network Neutrality is a lost cause. Instead, Andreessen argues, bandwidth isn’t infinite and the focus should be on the cable monopolies that erode innovation.
Looking for more background? Try the EFF, Why the FCC Can’t Actually Save Network Neutrality; or these posts from the Free Press on the FCC and media policy.
Image: How to Unfuck the Internet, via The Verge. 

Nilay Patel considers the end of Network Neutrality at The Verge:

Massive companies like AT&T and Comcast have spent the first two months of 2014 boldly announcing plans to close and control the internet through additional fees, pay-to-play schemes, and sheer brutal size — all while the legal rules designed to protect against these kinds of abuses were struck down in court for basically making too much sense. “Broadband providers represent a threat to internet openness,” concluded Judge David Tatel in Verizon’s case against the FCC’s Open Internet order, adding that the FCC had provided ample evidence of internet companies abusing their market power and had made “a rational connection between the facts found and the choices made.” Verizon argued strenuously, but had offered the court “no persuasive reason to question that judgement.”

Then Tatel cut the FCC off at the knees for making “a rather half-hearted argument” in support of its authority to properly police these threats and vacated the rules protecting the open internet, surprising observers on both sides of the industry and sending new FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler into a tailspin of empty promises seemingly designed to disappoint everyone.

Looking for a recommendation to bring Network Neutrality back? Make your voice heard by emailing and calling FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler.

Looking for a different perspective? Try GigaOm where Mathew Ingram pulls together a Twitter conversation between Marc Andreessen and assorted journalists about how enforcing Network Neutrality is a lost cause. Instead, Andreessen argues, bandwidth isn’t infinite and the focus should be on the cable monopolies that erode innovation.

Looking for more background? Try the EFF, Why the FCC Can’t Actually Save Network Neutrality; or these posts from the Free Press on the FCC and media policy.

Image: How to Unfuck the Internet, via The Verge

280 notes

Show

  1. nymph-lode reblogged this from futurejournalismproject and added:
    everyone needs to reblog this
  2. stoppingforawhile reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  3. apcondessa reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  4. dickbuttryuko reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  5. missmoose6 reblogged this from brandyliquor
  6. brother2thenight reblogged this from brandyliquor
  7. myabstractbox reblogged this from brandyliquor
  8. brandyliquor reblogged this from lastnamesir
  9. lastnamesir reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  10. turnsoutalliwantisequality reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  11. walpurgisak reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  12. joshypoo6 reblogged this from ifnotyouwhoelse
  13. breakyafayce reblogged this from notfromabove
  14. magpieandwhale reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  15. ifnotyouwhoelse reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  16. jeneticmutation reblogged this from liberalwithguts
  17. liberalwithguts reblogged this from crookedthinking95
  18. crookedthinking95 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  19. davveeeed reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  20. dkelly-for-president-2032 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  21. spontaneouslyfabulous reblogged this from pandahspunk
  22. pandahspunk reblogged this from tabbybeard
  23. strawwberrystars reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  24. notfromabove reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  25. t-r1nity reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  26. theanalyzersfanfics reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  27. god-is-a-flimsy-construct reblogged this from anarcho-queer

Blog comments powered by Disqus