Truthout Begins Publishing Department of Homeland Security Documents on Occupy Wall Street
Last October Truthout.org’s Jason Leopold filed a Freedom of Information Act Request with the Department of Homeland Security for “emails, memoranda, letters, audio/video, transcripts, reports, including Threat Assessments, related to the protest movement known as ‘Occupy Wall Street.’”
According to Truthout, a California-based nonprofit, the FOIA request seeks to answer whether the DHS advised local law enforcement officials on how to respond to Occupy Wall Street and it national offshoots.
Additionally, Truthout is making the documents it receives available to the public on its Web site.
I’ve scanned through a few and what’s interesting is not any perceived or nefarious activity, but rather looking at how the DHS’s internal media team acts and reacts to incoming requests from news organizations looking for comments and statements about specific activities.
For example, the screenshot above shows DHS Press Secretary Matthew Chandler explaining to other staff how to respond to inquiries from CBS, the Associated Press, Daily Caller and Salon. Specifically, that coordination is “not occurring in any wholesale manner” and references its official position that the DHS is “treating all of these protests nationwide as peaceful demonstrations.”
When the Central Intelligence Agency established a Center on Climate Change and National Security in 2009, it drew fierce opposition from congressional Republicans who disputed the need for an intelligence initiative on this topic. But now there is a different, and possibly better, reason to doubt the value of the Center: It has adopted an extreme view of classification policy which holds that everything the Center does is a national security secret.
Last week, the CIA categorically denied (pdf) a request under the Freedom of Information Act for a copy of any Center studies or reports concerning the impacts of global warming.
“We completed a thorough search for records responsive to your request and located material that we determined is currently and properly classified and must be denied in its entirety…,” wrote CIA’s Susan Viscuso to requester Jeffrey Richelson, an intelligence historian affiliated with the National Security Archive.
With some effort, one can imagine records related to climate change that would be properly classified. Such records might, for example, include information that was derived from classified collection methods or sources that could be compromised by their disclosure. Or perhaps such records might present analysis reflecting imminent threats to national security that would be exacerbated rather than corrected by publicizing them.
But that’s not what CIA said. Rather, it said that all of the Center’s work is classified and there is not even a single study, or a single passage in a single study, that could be released without damage to national security. That’s a familiar song, and it became tiresome long ago.