posts about or somewhat related to ‘social web’

First, on the operational side, if you think optimizing your Facebook page and Tweets is “optimizing for social,” you’re only halfway (or maybe 30 percent) correct. The only real way to optimize for social spread is in the nature of the content itself. There’s no way to game email or people’s instant messages. There’s no power users you can contact. There’s no algorithms to understand. This is pure social, uncut.

Alexis Madrigal, The Atlantic

The Web was Social Before the Social Web

Madrigal recently wrote about what he calls dark social. In short: dark social is the social sharing that happens outside of sites like Facebook and Twitter and is therefore hard to measure; for example, sharing links via e-mail and instant messaging. According to data by Chartbeat, across a number of media sites, almost 69% of social referrals were dark, whereas Facebook referrals came in at 20%.

One of the biggest implications he points out is this: 

If what I’m saying is true, then the tradeoffs we make on social networks is not the one that we’re told we’re making. We’re not giving our personal data in exchange for the ability to share links with friends. Massive numbers of people — a larger set than exists on any social network — already do that outside the social networks. Rather, we’re exchanging our personal data in exchange for the ability to publish and archive a record of our sharing. That may be a transaction you want to make, but it might not be the one you’ve been told you made. 

Yesterday, Matt Buchanan wrote something of a reaction to Madrigal’s piece, in which he breaks down just what the components of dark social are, how they might be more accurately defined, and the fact that they’re slowly coming out into the light.

Another point: It indicates how non-homogenous “dark social” likely is. There’s the part of it that’s older and non-urban, coming from non-mobile devices, and then there’s the part coming from younger users, which is more highly mobile. To oversimplify: old people on desktops reading emails, young people on phones.

FJP: Both are interesting reads if you’d like to think about the bigger picture of how you share links, why, and what social sites are really doing for you.

Q: Can I still access NYTimes.com articles through Facebook, Twitter, Google or my blog?
A: Yes. We encourage links from Facebook, Twitter, search engines, blogs and social media. When you visit NYTimes.com through a link from one of these channels, that article (or video, slide show, etc.) will count toward your monthly limit of 20 free articles, but you will still be able to view it even if you’ve already read your 20 free articles.

When you visit NYTimes.com by clicking links in Google search results, you’ll enjoy up to five free articles per day.

The New York Times Digital Subscription policy FAQ sits at 27 items and counting.

Go that? The NYT is trying to create more of a semi-permeable membrane than a strict, walled garden paywall.

Like? Share? Facebook updates a button.

The company also updated its commenting system for publishers, claiming it will increase social relevance. 

Via the Facebook Developers Blog:

Today, we’re launching updates to the Comments Box plugin with new moderation tools as well as features to improve the distribution and quality of comments on your site.

The upgraded Comments Box uses social signals to surface the highest quality comments for each user. Comments are ordered to show users the most relevant comments from friends, friends of friends, and the most liked or active discussion threads, while comments marked as spam are hidden from view.

All your comments now belong to us.